請教一個Two Weapon Fighting的問題 - TRPG
By Valerie
at 2009-03-24T14:18
at 2009-03-24T14:18
Table of Contents
※ 引述《LiouKen (小龜)》之銘言:
: 如果我的Fighter選了Two Weapon Fighting這個feat
: 那麼我副手的武器是不是一定要選Properties裡有off-hand這個關鍵字的武器?
: 因為單從feat的敘述來說
: While holding a melee weapon in each hand, you gain a +1 bonus to damage
: rolls with your main weapon.
: 看起來像是兩手都有拿武器就可以,並沒有限定拿什麼武器的感覺
: 請不吝指教
Off-Hand: An off-hand weapon is light enough
that you can hold it and attack effectively with it
while holding a weapon in your main hand. You can't
attack with both weapons in the same turn, unless
you have a power that lets you do so, but you can
attack with either weapon.
關鍵字effectively. 在PHB中明確提到Off-hand敘述者為
遊俠的攻擊威能與Epic Feat:Two Weapon Flurry. 除此之
外並沒有提出任何必須限定持有Off-Hand property才能發
揮的效應.
但考慮合理性, Off-Hand應該是必要的.
--
: 如果我的Fighter選了Two Weapon Fighting這個feat
: 那麼我副手的武器是不是一定要選Properties裡有off-hand這個關鍵字的武器?
: 因為單從feat的敘述來說
: While holding a melee weapon in each hand, you gain a +1 bonus to damage
: rolls with your main weapon.
: 看起來像是兩手都有拿武器就可以,並沒有限定拿什麼武器的感覺
: 請不吝指教
Off-Hand: An off-hand weapon is light enough
that you can hold it and attack effectively with it
while holding a weapon in your main hand. You can't
attack with both weapons in the same turn, unless
you have a power that lets you do so, but you can
attack with either weapon.
關鍵字effectively. 在PHB中明確提到Off-hand敘述者為
遊俠的攻擊威能與Epic Feat:Two Weapon Flurry. 除此之
外並沒有提出任何必須限定持有Off-Hand property才能發
揮的效應.
但考慮合理性, Off-Hand應該是必要的.
--
Tags:
TRPG
All Comments
By George
at 2009-03-26T03:27
at 2009-03-26T03:27
Related Posts
台北跑團的地點
By Tristan Cohan
at 2009-03-19T19:47
at 2009-03-19T19:47
台北跑團的地點
By Ursula
at 2009-03-19T18:52
at 2009-03-19T18:52
D&D 4E 玩家手冊II 已到貨!
By Carolina Franco
at 2009-03-19T13:57
at 2009-03-19T13:57
使徒靈氣
By Lydia
at 2009-03-18T20:04
at 2009-03-18T20:04
7th Sea
By Tracy
at 2009-03-17T21:55
at 2009-03-17T21:55