Re: TRPG發展多年仍劃地自限? - TRPG

By Lauren
at 2008-10-18T04:50
at 2008-10-18T04:50
Table of Contents
推 pache:原來對你來說新手皆小白...還是和你意見不同都是小白?10/16 03:46
→ pache:別人可有亂板,你膽敢隨意稱之為小白?你何德何能如此鄙視人?10/16 03:47
→ pache:人人平等,但兩位明顯嚴以待人寬以律己,又如何談平等!?10/16 03:49
→ pache:一人表明瞧不起別人,一人質疑他人很爽,別人質疑自己就不爽10/16 03:53
→ pache:如此行徑,還是TRPG界資深,難怪TRPG發展多年,仍在劃地自限10/16 03:56
→ pache:見下面板主制止,又見D板友後來態度良好的推文,回頭看這裡 10/16 04:22
→ pache:自知發言太過。原只是見有人口出小白一時氣不過, 10/16 04:22
→ pache:今願收回前言,多有冒犯非常抱歉,還請諸位見諒10/16 04:23
→ pache:已私信。另,個人行為和學校、家人無關,有問題請都找我就好 10/17 03:28
→ pache:我可以跟你爭辯在脈絡下它並沒有打翻(略),除非你只看那一句 10/17 03:38
→ pache:但我現在只想說..我早說過那是失言了,到底是為何如此追打.. 10/17 03:39
→ pache:就算那句打翻(略)又引戰,除了收回和道歉,你們還想要什麼? 10/17 03:42
→ pache:那很重要嗎? 不然我先問你,你說這些想要什麼? 10/17 03:45
→ pache:那請問可以就這樣結束嗎? 我可以再補另一篇道歉文也行 10/17 03:55
→ pache:戰文越戰越長的話,來看的人都會嫌煩而不想看的.... 10/17 03:55
→ pache:啊,我不是說不想看戰文,是指會不想看本板 10/17 04:04
「如此行徑,還是TRPG界資深,難怪TRPG發展多年,仍在劃地自限」,敝人很有
興趣了解一下,到底TRPG發展多年問題是出在哪?縱然自承一時失言脫口而出,
會有此一說,此等想法必然是醞釀許久,而非空穴來風。
而後續辯解「脈絡下它並沒有打翻(一船人?)」,敝人也對所謂的「脈絡下」要
如何解釋相當感興趣。
另該位版友對敝人的無端指控,如主觀揣測敝人「質疑他人很爽,別人質疑自己
就不爽」等,也是敝人相當感興趣的部分。
當然,該版友並無解釋的義務,個人只是因為好奇而想得知,相信對此感興趣的
並不只是該篇發言者,其他有意版眾應亦不在少數。還請該版友慈悲為懷,釋意
闡明以饗眾人。
討論玩家與業界發展相關,理當不至於被歸入版規中所述「離題文」,如有誤解
,煩請版主來信告知。:)
--
Tags:
TRPG
All Comments

By Hamiltion
at 2008-10-20T18:48
at 2008-10-20T18:48

By Iris
at 2008-10-23T09:42
at 2008-10-23T09:42

By Olga
at 2008-10-26T01:01
at 2008-10-26T01:01

By Ula
at 2008-10-28T22:35
at 2008-10-28T22:35

By Christine
at 2008-11-01T21:22
at 2008-11-01T21:22

By Jack
at 2008-11-06T09:14
at 2008-11-06T09:14

By Joseph
at 2008-11-08T13:31
at 2008-11-08T13:31

By George
at 2008-11-12T05:19
at 2008-11-12T05:19

By Carolina Franco
at 2008-11-13T21:34
at 2008-11-13T21:34

By Rae
at 2008-11-15T02:33
at 2008-11-15T02:33

By Xanthe
at 2008-11-19T12:03
at 2008-11-19T12:03

By Enid
at 2008-11-22T02:14
at 2008-11-22T02:14

By Enid
at 2008-11-24T07:36
at 2008-11-24T07:36

By Kristin
at 2008-11-29T05:04
at 2008-11-29T05:04

By Doris
at 2008-12-02T05:31
at 2008-12-02T05:31

By Zenobia
at 2008-12-04T18:10
at 2008-12-04T18:10

By Jake
at 2008-12-08T22:34
at 2008-12-08T22:34

By Caitlin
at 2008-12-09T04:56
at 2008-12-09T04:56

By Blanche
at 2008-12-12T23:23
at 2008-12-12T23:23

By Faithe
at 2008-12-13T22:50
at 2008-12-13T22:50

By Ina
at 2008-12-16T12:36
at 2008-12-16T12:36
Related Posts
四版系統的問題(一)

By Franklin
at 2008-10-18T04:24
at 2008-10-18T04:24
職位分割的難處─何謂控制?

By Oliver
at 2008-10-18T03:11
at 2008-10-18T03:11
PC想要強大的能力,但DM為保持平衡...

By Caroline
at 2008-10-18T01:25
at 2008-10-18T01:25
職位分割的難處─何謂控制? (二)

By Ingrid
at 2008-10-18T01:17
at 2008-10-18T01:17
職位分割的難處─何謂控制?

By Noah
at 2008-10-18T00:23
at 2008-10-18T00:23