觸發效應敘述中包含"if"的情況 - 魔法風雲會

※ 引述《tinyfan (小風扇)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《mikemai0080 (mike)》之銘言：
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: 所以這兩者是不同的嗎?
: 另外完整規則
: 603.4. A triggered ability may read “When/Whenever/At [trigger event],
: if [condition], [effect].” When the trigger event occurs, the ability
: checks whether the stated condition is true. The ability triggers
: only if it is; otherwise it does nothing. If the ability triggers,
: it checks the stated condition again as it resolves.
: If the condition isn’t true at that time, the ability is
: removed from the stack and does nothing. Note that this
: mirrors the check for legal targets. This rule is referred
: to as the “intervening ‘if’ clause” rule.
: (The word “if” has only its normal English meaning anywhere else
: in the text of a card; this rule only applies to an “if” that
: immediately follows a trigger condition.)
: 最後括號中的敘述是說if後面跟的就是觸發條件?
兩者是不同的
()內的簡單來說, "if"這個單字作為"規則"處理的條件是接在觸發條件之後
看看英文的敘述
鬥智是
At the beginning of your upkeep, if you have 200 or more cards in your
library, you win the game.
"在你的維持開始時，[若]你的牌庫中有200張或更多的牌，你便贏得此盤遊戲。"

戒指是
At the beginning of your upkeep, put a +1/+1 counter on equipped creature if
it's white.
"在你的維持開始時，如果佩帶此武具的生物為白色，則在其上放置一個+1/+1指示物。"

也就是說 "if"這個單字在鬥智視為"規則"
而在戒指中只視為一般敘述，所以不符合上述文章的if的堆疊處理等規則

也就是說中文的牌敘述上話if有沒有接在觸發條件後用的是不同敘述
沒看到"若"就不用當規則處理了...吧? 可能要多找一些例子來看

--