※ [本文轉錄自 XBOX 看板 #1FOXuS1I ]
作者: talan (這個好吃嗎) 看板: XBOX
標題: [情報]國外某雜誌給《惡靈古堡:拉坤市行動》評分
時間: Fri Mar 16 00:51:38 2012
看到評分，我笑了...
外國雜誌GAME TM 120期的評分
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=466666
Mass Effect 3 [9]
Street Fighter X Tekken [8]
Asura's Wrath [7]
Unit 13 [5]
Gotham City Imposters [7]
SSX [5]
Resident Evil Operation Raccoon City [3] !!!!!
Alan Wake's American Nightmare [5] Joker
Lumines Vita [8]
Tekken 3D [6]
Warp [8]
Syndicate [8]
Binary Domain [7]
Escape Plan [6]
Journey [9]
一些評論中的內容
'For Resi they stated how it was like a SOCOM game with a Resident Evil skin
hence not fitting in with the brand, AI of teammates is dreadful i.e. run
into walls, shoot at nothing, only good at being bullet sponges, criticised
glitches like zombies popping out of thin air 'mere centimetres away',
unimaginative bland set pieces like zombies popping out of doors and closets,
the list goes on. They also mentioned how the Leon Kennedy scene doesn't even
get a cutscene or any other fanfare therefore a wasted opportunity, wondering
why Capcom even gave the reins to Slant Six although the reviewer 'wished
them no ill'. I must stress this was only the single player code they
reviewed 'due to print constraints' but still harsh.'
他們展現了一款SOCOM(該開發公司的成名作)披上惡靈古堡皮是多麼的不合。
隊友AI爛到炸掉，如衝向牆壁、對空氣射擊，唯一的優點就是吸引敵軍砲火。
有重大的瑕疵，如殭屍會在距離你只有幾公分的距離突然憑空出現，
還有老梗無聊的定番，如殭屍從門後或櫥櫃裡突然出現，諸如此類。
他們還提到有關Leon的場面，連個過場動畫或是其他的出場介紹什麼的都沒有，
明明就很多東西可以做，真是白白浪費機會。
很想知道為何CAPCOM會讓Slant Six(開發公司)這樣胡搞
最後這評分因為截稿時間，所以只有針對單機的樣子，不過還是"糟糕透了"
---
不過他們的評分也，怎麼說，好像不少款標準都好嚴，如SSX、阿蘭美夢只拿到5...
總之先看看就好吧XD
--
作者: talan (這個好吃嗎) 看板: XBOX
標題: [情報]國外某雜誌給《惡靈古堡:拉坤市行動》評分
時間: Fri Mar 16 00:51:38 2012
看到評分，我笑了...
外國雜誌GAME TM 120期的評分
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=466666
Mass Effect 3 [9]
Street Fighter X Tekken [8]
Asura's Wrath [7]
Unit 13 [5]
Gotham City Imposters [7]
SSX [5]
Resident Evil Operation Raccoon City [3] !!!!!
Alan Wake's American Nightmare [5] Joker
Lumines Vita [8]
Tekken 3D [6]
Warp [8]
Syndicate [8]
Binary Domain [7]
Escape Plan [6]
Journey [9]
一些評論中的內容
'For Resi they stated how it was like a SOCOM game with a Resident Evil skin
hence not fitting in with the brand, AI of teammates is dreadful i.e. run
into walls, shoot at nothing, only good at being bullet sponges, criticised
glitches like zombies popping out of thin air 'mere centimetres away',
unimaginative bland set pieces like zombies popping out of doors and closets,
the list goes on. They also mentioned how the Leon Kennedy scene doesn't even
get a cutscene or any other fanfare therefore a wasted opportunity, wondering
why Capcom even gave the reins to Slant Six although the reviewer 'wished
them no ill'. I must stress this was only the single player code they
reviewed 'due to print constraints' but still harsh.'
他們展現了一款SOCOM(該開發公司的成名作)披上惡靈古堡皮是多麼的不合。
隊友AI爛到炸掉，如衝向牆壁、對空氣射擊，唯一的優點就是吸引敵軍砲火。
有重大的瑕疵，如殭屍會在距離你只有幾公分的距離突然憑空出現，
還有老梗無聊的定番，如殭屍從門後或櫥櫃裡突然出現，諸如此類。
他們還提到有關Leon的場面，連個過場動畫或是其他的出場介紹什麼的都沒有，
明明就很多東西可以做，真是白白浪費機會。
很想知道為何CAPCOM會讓Slant Six(開發公司)這樣胡搞
最後這評分因為截稿時間，所以只有針對單機的樣子，不過還是"糟糕透了"
---
不過他們的評分也，怎麼說，好像不少款標準都好嚴，如SSX、阿蘭美夢只拿到5...
總之先看看就好吧XD
--
All Comments