中路進攻/邊路進攻的使用時機 - 線上

這一篇是該文的第一篇回文，也寫的滿不錯的，順手翻 !!


Looks like you've caught the most important aspects of AOW.
However, there is one thing you should emphasise more.
You mention it, but not directly and many people are unaware of this:
When using AOW, will it actually help you?
I've heard many people say "But I have good wing attacks and a high
tactical skill. Surely it's correct to attack on the wings?
Why did I still lose?" What they fail to understand is that
it's not the attack ratings they have to look at.
It's the chance of scoring on the wing

看起來你已經抓到邊路進攻的精隨了，不過還有一點我必須要補充。
在你的文章中有提到這一點，但是你並沒有特別強調，
同時很多玩家並沒有意識到這一點:
當你使用邊路進攻戰術時，真的能幫助到你嗎 ?

我曾經聽到很多玩家說:我有不錯的邊路進攻評級還有不錯的邊路進攻戰術技能，
難道邊路進攻戰術沒有辦法幫到我嗎 ?
為什麼我還是輸掉比賽了 ?

這裡有個很容易被忽略的重點 :
重要的是，選擇你最容易進球和贏球的方式，而不是選擇你能排出來的最高評級 !!


compared to the chance of scoring in the middle.
That is, they have to consider their opponent's defence ratings as well.

你同時也需要考量中路進攻的進球機會，
換句話說，你也必須考量對手三線的防守評級，而不是只考量你自己能排出來的評級。


Example: A team gets solid attack ratings on both wings,
and only weak central attack. But their opponent
(either because he's done his research or because he likes to play
offensive central defender) has excellent wing defence and weak
central defence.
So you actually reduce your chances of scoring by diverting a chance
from the centre to the wing.
In addition to this you reduce your own central defence which can be
disastrous. It would be much better to play normal.
Even AIM would (probably) be a better option despite you having far
better wing attacks.

舉例來說，你可以堆出穩定評級的兩條邊路進攻，以及弱評級的中路進攻。
(不論是你已經做好了情蒐，或是對手喜歡擺上進攻中後衛)，
如果對手的防守評級，兩條邊路都是優秀，而中路防守評級是差，
如果你還選擇邊路進攻戰術把普通進攻的機會從中路轉向邊路，
是不明智且減少你得分機會的選擇。
同時邊路進攻戰術損失的15%中路防守或許會是你落敗的關鍵。

即使你有比較好的邊路進攻評級，
有時候選擇踢常規戰術，甚至是中路進攻戰術，都比你踢邊路進攻戰術來的理想。

Also AOW can be very useful against other AOW-teams.
Because they play AOW they usually have a bad central attack so the
defence punishment doesn't matter that much.
Also, they often play offensive wingers, so their wing defence is normally
weak.
By playing correctly, it can favour you to play AOW, while removing the
effect of your opponent's AOW.
Say 2 defensive wing backs to stop his wing attacks and one offensive
central defender depending on the situation.
You can even play 2 offensive wingers and 2 normal forwards.
This way you can have wing attacks way superior to his wing defence
while also having a good chance of scoring in the middle.

選擇邊路進攻戰術對抗邊路進攻戰術，是不錯的主意。
因為邊路進攻戰術的球隊，中路進攻的評級通常都不會太好，
所以邊路進攻戰術15%中路防守的損失，不太容易成為致命傷。

同時，邊路進攻戰術的球對，通常都會排上進攻型邊鋒，
換句話說，邊路防守的評級通常也不會太好。

只要選擇正確，選擇邊路進攻戰術可以抵銷對手邊路進攻戰術的優點，
你是會因此而得利的。

擺上兩個防守型邊後衛可以防守對手不錯的邊路進攻評級，
同時根據情況，你也可以擺上一個進攻型中後衛。

你甚至可以擺上兩個進攻型邊鋒 + 兩個普通站位的前鋒，
如此你可以在邊路進攻評級勝過對手邊路防守的前提下，
同時在中路進攻也擁有不錯的進球機會。

And that's another issue I would like to address.
Many neglect their central attack completely when playing AOW and
instead chooses complete overkill on te wings.
It's better to have, say one level below (the opponent's defence)
in the middle and 2 levels above on the wing than 5 levels below in the middle
and 6 levels above on the wing when playing AOW.
You won't divert all attacks, and normally you waste many chances
in the middle that easiliy could have been converted.

這裡我還要強調另外一點 :
很多玩家在踢邊路進攻戰術時，完全忽略了自己的中路進攻評級，
一般來說，
比較起對手的防守評級，中路進攻 1 level down + 邊路進攻 2 level up，
會比中路進攻 5 level down + 邊路進攻 6 level up 來的好。

原因是 : 並不是所有的普通機會都會從中路轉向邊路，
如此一來，你會浪費太多你原本可以打進的中路普通機會。

Also, AOW can be a defensive strategy.
Against a superior opponent with a bad central attack,
you could focus on midfield and wing defence and play with one
(or two if possible) wing attacks and pray.
This could work as an alternative to pressing.
An example could be 4-5-1 with 2 defensive wing backs, 2 central
defenders towards wing, one WTM and one offensive wing in
combination with FTW on the same side.

同時，邊路進攻戰術也可以是個不錯的防守策略。
如果你的對手比你強一點，但是中路進攻評級比較差，
你可以專注於跟對手搶中場，堆邊路防守評級，
同時堆出一條或是兩條不錯的邊路進攻評級，
當這些都做完了，就開始祈禱吧。

這也是個全場壓迫戰術的替代選擇，
舉例來說，你可以選擇踢451同時擺上兩個防守型邊後衛、兩個靠邊中後衛、
一個靠中路邊鋒、一個進攻型邊鋒、同時一個和進攻型邊鋒同邊的靠邊路前鋒。

--

全世界最長壽之足球線上遊戲Hattrick，

Hattrick專板歡迎你一起加入遊戲，一起討論，教學相長。

8. 戰略高手 --> 9. G_Online --> 2. Hattrick

--