Storm Q&A - War Game

這篇是 12/6 的文章，所以請搭配 12/5、6 Q&A 服用

我只是想翻個人任務相關的回答而已 wwww



- individual missions (I translated the name from Russian IBZ –
individualnye boyevye zadachi) were official renamed to “personal missions”

individual missions 更名為 personal missions
（譯：反正都翻成一點也不『個人』的個人任務）

- Q: “personal missions are there not for your fun, but to make you play it
a longer!” A: “Yes, we’ll make you by force! By pointing submachine guns
at you!”

Q:「個人任務根本不是做出來娛樂的，而是逼你玩久一點！」A:「沒錯！我們還會拿槍抵
著你的頭逼你玩！」

- Storm explains the presence of platoon requirements in personal missions: “
The name is personal missions, not individual. There are generally only a few
missions with platoon requirement. Platoons = socializing. A player who is
socializing plays significantly longer.”

Storm 解釋組排限制的存在意義：「這是個人任務，不是單人任務。基本上也只有少數
任務需要組排。組排就是交流，會交流的玩家明顯地會玩的比較久。」

- it’s apparently not possible to move the names of tanks on the improved
minimap to the left from the icon, as it cause graphic glitches

無法把小地圖上的車名移到標誌左邊；會造成繪圖錯誤

- a render range rectangle was not implemented into the new map because it
will change to a circle relatively soon

（舊聞，略）

- viewrange circle was not implemented because it exists as a mod anyway and
who really wants it can use a mod

不做視距圈的原因在於已經有MOD了，想用的人請去裝MOD

- FV4005 characteristics are not final

FV4005 的數據還會改

- there is a serious (and common) bug on test server, where – after you quit
the battle – you see that battle’s minimap in the hangar (SS: and you can
watch how the battle is going in the hangar, actually I think it would be a
neat feature)

（測試服的 bug，略）

- Storm thinks that the platoon requirement for missions is final

Storm 認為任務的組排限制已是定稿

- Storm confirms that the Mittengard map is lowtier only (SS: why the hell
does it have an encounter mode then) and that Gost Town will not appear in
random battles

（舊聞，略）

- Storm states that you don’t have to play artillery to complete the
personal missions

（舊聞，略）

- Storm commenting about players raging that they have to platoon for the
personal missions: “Yea, it’s the righteous anger because in order to get
the reward, you will actually have to make some effort. Everyone just wants
free stuff.”

Storm 評論玩家怒反組排限制的情況：「要求他們為了獎賞而做些努力；對此憤恨不平還
真是好棒棒。大家都只想要躺著領免費禮物。」

- Q: “Forced socialization sucks!” A: “Tell that to the Blizzard guys.”

Q:「強迫交流遜斃了」A:「跟玻璃渣抱怨去」

- Q: “Why can’t you make the missions pop in automatically, like
achievements?” A: “We don’t want to have players ‘getting the missions’
just so. In order to get the tank and other rewards, you will have to make a
certain effort. If you are too lazy to make the effort, you can continue
playing like you did without paying heed to the missions.”

Q:「為啥不將個人任務設為自動啟動？」A:「我們不想讓玩家不知不覺下完成任務。想獲
得獎賞總要做些努力；若你懶得去手動啟動，大可當這任務不存在繼續開心玩。」

- Storm states that WG doesn’t want to implement lighter and lighter tanks
without armor. It’s just that “choosing future branches is a complicated
question.”

Storm 表示不想做更輕的無裝甲戰車。因為「規劃未來的科技樹是個複雜的問題。」
（譯者：不是很懂這條想表達什麼…）

- Storm confirms that the missions are not balanced yet

個人任務數據尚未平衡

http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/12/06/storm-qa-2/

--
In church, they say to forgive!

Forgiveness is between them and God;

it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》

--