SS: Obj. 140 與 T-62A 哪個比較好? - War Game

原文網址:
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/28/which-one-is-better-object-140-or-t-62a/

=

Source: wot-news.com
來源: wot-news.com

Hello everyone,
大家好:

As some of you know, I am not exactly fond of Soviet tanks (I levelled up the
T-54, but that’s about it), so I can’t really evaluate the Object 140′s
performance, compared to the T-62. That’s why I am taking Edrard’s assessment
and translating it to English. Edrard is the owner of wot-news and generally
a good player, so I think his opinion counts in this. First, let’s have a look
at Object 140′s armor and size, compared to the T-62A:

某些人可能知道我不是很喜歡蘇聯戰車(我有升到 T-54，不過就只有這樣)，所以我沒辦
法真正去評量和比較 Obj. 140 與 T-62 的性能。這是我將 Edrard 的評測翻譯成英文的
原因，Edrard 是個不錯的玩家同時也是 wot-news 的所有者，所以我認為他對 Obj. 140
與 T-62 的看法應該可以參考。首先我們來看 Obj. 140 的大小與裝甲以及和 T-62A 的
比較:

http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/part2_12.jpg

http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/part2_13.jpg

Size comparison to T-62A:
與 T-62A 的大小比較:

http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/part2_15.jpg

Stats comparison on paper:
紙上資料比較:

http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/part2_14.jpg

Edrard on their comparison (edited by me a bit in order to make it more
comprehensive):
Edrard 比較兩輛車的結論 (稍微修改讓它比較容易讀懂):

As you can see from the pictures above, Object 140 is a bit lighter, faster
and smaller. It’s frontal armor has a better angle. On the other hand, T-62A
has a better hull and turret turnrate – and yes, 50 more hitpoints. But
that’s not really that important. Frontal armor of both the T-62A and Object
140 can be penetrated by tier 8 heavies, both turrets are very tough and like
to ricochet shells and if anyone tells you that the Object 140 is much better
than the T-62A – don’t trust him.

從上面的圖片可以看出 Obj.140 比較輕一點、快一點、小一點，同時它的前裝甲角度也
比較好。另一方面 T-62A 的車身裝甲和砲塔轉速比較好，另外還有一項不太重要的優點:
多了 50 血量。T-62A 與 Obj.140 的前裝甲都會被 T8 重坦擊穿，兩者的砲塔都很硬而
且很會彈砲。如果有人跟你說 Obj. 140 比 T-62A 好很多，他在唬你。

Both vehicles are basically modifications of one of the same tank: the T-54
and that’s why they are very much alike, like twin brothers. Object 140 is
an excellent tier 10 tank, practically identical to T-62A – and that’s his
problem. Gameplay-wise, both vehicles are are absolutely identical and it
brings nothing new to the game, which stands out even more when we consider
other vehicles of the branch, such as A-44 and Object 416, which are quite
unusual.

兩輛車基本上都是從 T-54 改出來的，這也是為什麼它們很像雙胞胎的原因。 Obj. 140
是輛很棒的 T10 車，唯一的問題是原則上它和 T-62A 一模一樣，玩起來的感覺也完全一
樣，不像該中坦線上其他車子(A-44、Obj. 416)一樣特殊。

At this moment, the Soviet tree seems to me as the one most raw and least
finished. There’s a hole at tier 5 in the light tank branch, second medium
branch is missing tier 9 and 10, as Object 140 is more like a development of
the T-54 and has no relationship towards the Kharkov tanks. Now we can only
wait for them to fill the gaps and introduce new vehicles, corresponding to
the intended concept of the branches.

就我看來，目前蘇聯線是最不完整的；輕坦線在 T5 有個空缺、第二條中坦線少了 T9 和
T10 車 (Obj. 140 比較像是 T-54 的延伸而和 Kharkov 的車輛無關)。我們現在只能等
WG 加些新車把這些分支上的空缺補齊。

Silentstalker: Well, there you have it. He thinks the vehicles are
practically identical and so do I. One thing that is notable is the upper
turret weakspot: the roof is very thin and as the vehicle is quite low, it’s
possible to penetrate. 8.8 test players already noticed this “feature”. But
other than that, for different gameplay, we’ll have to wait for the Object
430.

SS: Edrard 他覺得兩輛車基本上完全一樣，我也這麼覺得。有件值得注意的事情是砲塔
上部的弱點: 此車不高加上頂端非常薄，很有機會車頂會被擊穿。 8.8 測服的玩家已經
注意到這個 "特點"。如果想要有輛玩起來不一樣的車，那要等 Obj. 430了。

=

完

--