有人問了,CI也回答了
http://www.cranialinsertion.com/article/853
(這周是連體卡周,所以排版看起來很辛苦......)
Q: If Kaalia of the Vast attacks and brings out Master of Cruelties, can its
ability still trigger even though it never attacked?
A: Its ability can still trigger. "Whenever this attacks and isn't blocked"
sounds a lot like "Whenever this attacks," but both templates have explicitly
different definitions in the rules; "attacks and isn't blocked" cares more
about the "isn't blocked" and doesn't really care if the creature attacked.
簡單說,「每當此生物攻擊且未受阻擋時」與「每當此生物攻擊時」
因為語法不同,所以規則上也不盡相同
後者要求該生物必須被宣告攻擊,所以佳莉雅拖進場的時候不算
(知名combo:無垠的佳莉雅+污化魔王拉鐸司 就是利用這點)
然後前者不用管有沒有宣告攻擊,它只在乎是不是未受阻擋
白話說明:
對手必須犧牲一隻生物擋下暴行大師,或是至少擋住/殺死佳莉雅
否則佳莉雅的戰鬥傷害會把他成為1的生命一波帶走
漲價吧,暴行大師
題外話,因為在公共場所玩MTG而差點要去坐牢的Eli Shiffrin看來生還了
(不過他也因此換了工作,中間的細節就不清楚了)
當然MTG以及上面的惡魔是無罪的,有罪的是在公共場所使用賭博工具(骰子)
溪堡貴族對此表示憤怒,鬼怪試飛員表示你有我慘嗎
--
http://www.cranialinsertion.com/article/853
(這周是連體卡周,所以排版看起來很辛苦......)
Q: If Kaalia of the Vast attacks and brings out Master of Cruelties, can its
ability still trigger even though it never attacked?
A: Its ability can still trigger. "Whenever this attacks and isn't blocked"
sounds a lot like "Whenever this attacks," but both templates have explicitly
different definitions in the rules; "attacks and isn't blocked" cares more
about the "isn't blocked" and doesn't really care if the creature attacked.
簡單說,「每當此生物攻擊且未受阻擋時」與「每當此生物攻擊時」
因為語法不同,所以規則上也不盡相同
後者要求該生物必須被宣告攻擊,所以佳莉雅拖進場的時候不算
(知名combo:無垠的佳莉雅+污化魔王拉鐸司 就是利用這點)
然後前者不用管有沒有宣告攻擊,它只在乎是不是未受阻擋
白話說明:
對手必須犧牲一隻生物擋下暴行大師,或是至少擋住/殺死佳莉雅
否則佳莉雅的戰鬥傷害會把他成為1的生命一波帶走
漲價吧,暴行大師
題外話,因為在公共場所玩MTG而差點要去坐牢的Eli Shiffrin看來生還了
(不過他也因此換了工作,中間的細節就不清楚了)
當然MTG以及上面的惡魔是無罪的,有罪的是在公共場所使用賭博工具(骰子)
溪堡貴族對此表示憤怒,鬼怪試飛員表示你有我慘嗎
--
All Comments