又收到鉅款了 @_@ - 撲克牌

By Una
at 2010-07-20T21:20
at 2010-07-20T21:20
Table of Contents
81.6!!!!(對我這小咖來說...這退款真的頗大= =)
don到底有多少作弊的啊? 囧......
真的要人人勤儉舉.... 反正大家一起亂槍打鳥 組成交叉火網
總是會對認真打的有回饋的 XD
--
分享信件往來 英文很爛的我用三個單字就獲得回報了 =3=
Subject: Re: PokerStars Support - Collusion Review Complete
>http://www.pokerhand.org/?5557685
>
>What the fuck...
Hello Chien,
Thank you once more for your report and apologies if there was any delay in
bringing this case to a close. This particular case was quite involved and
more time than usual was required for a proper review.
Our review of 'Gr3yS0u1' and 'bes-groza' is now complete. We confirmed a
relationship and found that they did go easy on one another (known as soft
play) on occasion. This is a violation of our tournament rule #20 as posted at:
http://www.pokerstars.com/tournamentsrules.html
We have the advantage of being able to replay the games with all cards
exposed. We carefully reviewed all events in which at least one of the two
finished in the money. As a result of our findings, players who were likely
harmed by the unfair play have been advanced and have received credits
consistent with their new finish position at the expense of the colluders.
Due to your run-ins with these players, you will receive your buy-in
($10.80) back for T#290942326 and T#290942347, and get advanced into ITM for
$20.00 in T#290942317, T#290942235 and T#290942336. Your account has been
credited with $81.60 to cover the compensation.
It is not uncommon to find that players are not aware of the seriousness of
such action in tournament play. The overall review, which included requests
for explanations from the players and consideration of all account
information, led us to conclude that their action was not malicious.
Therefore they will be allowed to continue playing on the site. That said,
we did take action to see that they do not play in the same Sit & Go
Tournaments in the future, or at the same cash game table for that matter.
The integrity of the games at PokerStars is of paramount importance to us
and we will not abide unfair play in our games. We work hard to police our
games to assure our players of a fair, secure place to play. In the rare
cases where collusion has actually occurred, we make sure that any players
affected are compensated appropriately.Your vigilance in noticing the
situation and reporting your concerns are appreciated. Please do not
hesitate to let us know anytime you have questions or concerns.
Best regards,
Fredrik E
Poker Specialist
PokerStars Support Team
--
don到底有多少作弊的啊? 囧......
真的要人人勤儉舉.... 反正大家一起亂槍打鳥 組成交叉火網
總是會對認真打的有回饋的 XD
--
分享信件往來 英文很爛的我用三個單字就獲得回報了 =3=
Subject: Re: PokerStars Support - Collusion Review Complete
>http://www.pokerhand.org/?5557685
>
>What the fuck...
Hello Chien,
Thank you once more for your report and apologies if there was any delay in
bringing this case to a close. This particular case was quite involved and
more time than usual was required for a proper review.
Our review of 'Gr3yS0u1' and 'bes-groza' is now complete. We confirmed a
relationship and found that they did go easy on one another (known as soft
play) on occasion. This is a violation of our tournament rule #20 as posted at:
http://www.pokerstars.com/tournamentsrules.html
We have the advantage of being able to replay the games with all cards
exposed. We carefully reviewed all events in which at least one of the two
finished in the money. As a result of our findings, players who were likely
harmed by the unfair play have been advanced and have received credits
consistent with their new finish position at the expense of the colluders.
Due to your run-ins with these players, you will receive your buy-in
($10.80) back for T#290942326 and T#290942347, and get advanced into ITM for
$20.00 in T#290942317, T#290942235 and T#290942336. Your account has been
credited with $81.60 to cover the compensation.
It is not uncommon to find that players are not aware of the seriousness of
such action in tournament play. The overall review, which included requests
for explanations from the players and consideration of all account
information, led us to conclude that their action was not malicious.
Therefore they will be allowed to continue playing on the site. That said,
we did take action to see that they do not play in the same Sit & Go
Tournaments in the future, or at the same cash game table for that matter.
The integrity of the games at PokerStars is of paramount importance to us
and we will not abide unfair play in our games. We work hard to police our
games to assure our players of a fair, secure place to play. In the rare
cases where collusion has actually occurred, we make sure that any players
affected are compensated appropriately.Your vigilance in noticing the
situation and reporting your concerns are appreciated. Please do not
hesitate to let us know anytime you have questions or concerns.
Best regards,
Fredrik E
Poker Specialist
PokerStars Support Team
--
Tags:
撲克牌
All Comments

By Enid
at 2010-07-23T00:25
at 2010-07-23T00:25

By Aaliyah
at 2010-07-23T07:47
at 2010-07-23T07:47

By Sandy
at 2010-07-28T02:28
at 2010-07-28T02:28

By Jessica
at 2010-07-30T02:14
at 2010-07-30T02:14

By Edwina
at 2010-07-31T08:57
at 2010-07-31T08:57

By Candice
at 2010-08-03T07:38
at 2010-08-03T07:38

By Candice
at 2010-08-03T10:58
at 2010-08-03T10:58

By Susan
at 2010-08-07T11:07
at 2010-08-07T11:07

By Oliver
at 2010-08-11T21:06
at 2010-08-11T21:06

By Bethany
at 2010-08-16T11:40
at 2010-08-16T11:40

By Yedda
at 2010-08-17T11:35
at 2010-08-17T11:35

By Cara
at 2010-08-18T21:38
at 2010-08-18T21:38

By Enid
at 2010-08-22T18:32
at 2010-08-22T18:32

By Oscar
at 2010-08-26T01:35
at 2010-08-26T01:35

By Regina
at 2010-08-30T05:10
at 2010-08-30T05:10

By Andy
at 2010-09-02T12:11
at 2010-09-02T12:11

By Kama
at 2010-09-03T11:00
at 2010-09-03T11:00

By Faithe
at 2010-09-05T15:38
at 2010-09-05T15:38

By Anonymous
at 2010-09-08T20:27
at 2010-09-08T20:27

By Kelly
at 2010-09-09T15:51
at 2010-09-09T15:51

By Hamiltion
at 2010-09-12T14:18
at 2010-09-12T14:18

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2010-09-15T20:03
at 2010-09-15T20:03

By Michael
at 2010-09-18T08:33
at 2010-09-18T08:33

By Anonymous
at 2010-09-21T20:44
at 2010-09-21T20:44

By George
at 2010-09-25T04:42
at 2010-09-25T04:42

By Gilbert
at 2010-09-28T20:45
at 2010-09-28T20:45

By Donna
at 2010-09-30T10:11
at 2010-09-30T10:11

By Ula
at 2010-10-02T12:24
at 2010-10-02T12:24

By Elvira
at 2010-10-06T23:44
at 2010-10-06T23:44

By Candice
at 2010-10-11T21:10
at 2010-10-11T21:10

By Necoo
at 2010-10-13T06:14
at 2010-10-13T06:14

By Gilbert
at 2010-10-15T19:56
at 2010-10-15T19:56
Related Posts
合法?

By Noah
at 2010-07-20T19:54
at 2010-07-20T19:54
在don要如何衡量潛在的caller

By Ophelia
at 2010-07-20T19:36
at 2010-07-20T19:36
問一下PLO的一手牌

By Quintina
at 2010-07-20T17:08
at 2010-07-20T17:08
FTP點數?

By Ursula
at 2010-07-20T16:35
at 2010-07-20T16:35
FBI教你牌桌讀心術:從行為細節看穿對手的真假虛實

By Daph Bay
at 2010-07-20T15:09
at 2010-07-20T15:09