[Wii] Heatseeker Review - 任天堂

By Puput
at 2007-05-01T13:18
at 2007-05-01T13:18
Table of Contents
Heatseeker Review
http://wii.ign.com/articles/784/784685p1.html
http://wii.ign.com/articles/784/784685p2.html (影片欣賞)
有兩頁的講評, 我沒時間看, 所以只看看結語
大體上是講畫面很普通, 甚至只是 PSP版本的加強版
缺乏讓人覺得熱血的要素
與其想玩此類遊戲, IGN 推薦去玩 VC 的飛行遊戲 @@a
倒是玩家評分出現非常兩極的評價:
http://rr.wii.ign.com/rrview/wii/heatseeker/858377/61742/
http://rr.wii.ign.com/rrview/wii/heatseeker/858377/63246/
不過低分的項目倒是被畫面給拉低不少就是了
--------下為IGN官方評分---------
5.5 Presentation
There are a ton of known aircraft in the game (Migs, Yaks, and F-series
planes), but the menu navigation and pre-flight is a bit basic, and sometimes
quite cheesy. Very “last generation.”
4.5 Graphics
The aircraft models look decent, and many of the animations are noticeably
smooth, but supporting models/animation is pathetic. All land/water objects
are far too simple, and wreak of PSP.
5.0 Sound
There are some hokey VO moments, but the general flight audio is decent.
Explosions ring out, sound barriers break, though details (such as the Wii
remote speaker) are often ignored.
6.5 Gameplay
Heatseeker has its moments, but lacks a ton of the adrenaline the game was
banking on. Dogfights can be entertaining, but it’s just as easy to sit back
and missile baddies from afar.
5.5 Lasting Appeal
18 missions total, each with sub-missions inside. If you’re down with the
gameplay there’s 10+ hours to be had, but not a ton beyond that. Linear
missions, lack of multiplayer.
OVERALL:5.5
--
▃▅▄▂ │ Wii ▋\ = _ ̄◣ ╲ ▏▆▄▂
◤▃▄▃ ) │ will rock U▋﹨ _\ \_ ◣╲ ▕▕│ ▉
█▇▆█▏▊╯ │ ▊\ \▄ ,▄ ◣ (﹙(▎|| ▊
▍◥▇▊◤▕▋ └───┬───┬ ﹨  ̄\▄ ̄ ◣ ▋│▏Nintendo▏
▎ ▅▆ ▉by ╭─┴───┴▊\  ̄ ˍ ◣ ▕ˍ▁▂▃▄
▍ ▕▋Gatchaman ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ﹨ ╭′Α‵﹑ ◣ ▕▇▊████▍
--
Tags:
任天堂
All Comments
Related Posts
海賊王的一個道具

By Linda
at 2007-05-01T12:54
at 2007-05-01T12:54
Wii海賊王 (主線攻略3)

By Zora
at 2007-05-01T12:36
at 2007-05-01T12:36
Wii正式登陸新加坡 強制搭配價格令ꐠ…

By Bethany
at 2007-05-01T12:13
at 2007-05-01T12:13
Wii軟體宣傳手冊2007

By Agnes
at 2007-05-01T12:08
at 2007-05-01T12:08
wii的拳擊熟練度上限是多少阿

By Delia
at 2007-05-01T11:29
at 2007-05-01T11:29