TNP前國教Tian之feedback..
I would play CA with some midfield against teams who have low attack.
如果對手的進攻評級比較低，我會選擇擺上有中場的防守反擊的佈陣
Normally in a CA you would put a lot of defence and lot of attack.
But if your defence is much better than your opponents' attack,
you can play an inner midfielder instead of a defender.
正常來說，如果你選擇放上防守反擊的陣形，
你的防守評級會比較高、同時進攻評級會比較低，
但是如果你的防守遠遠勝過對手的進攻，你可以犧牲一點防守換中場
In a CA, ideally, you defence should be 5 levels higher than the
opponents' attack in order to defend effectively.
If you find yourself having ET defence, while your opponent only gets,
for example, outstanding attack,
playing for more midfield could increase your chances of a good result.
在防守反擊的比賽，理想上，
你的防守應該要比對手高上5個級別，這樣你的防守會非常的有效率
(這句話不知道怎麼跑出來的，只能說真的很理想)
舉例來說，如果你可以擺出超凡脫俗(16)的防線，
但是你的對手只能擺出傑出(10)的進攻時，
犧牲一點防守換中場，會提高該場比賽得到好結果的機率
#EDIT : 傑出是級別10才對
--
All Comments